Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '17 at 03:40
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 110
2-Core 199
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 310
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 61.4
60% 68.8 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128M7VG 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 504
Write 106
Mixed 148
54% 252 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 6.94
68% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 28.4
34% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
2TB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 205
Mixed 117
122% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 5.36
4K Mixed 0.79
219% 2.31 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 13.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.1
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H270M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $207
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback