Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-8650 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 406 User benchmarks, average bench 44% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 25.4 2-Core 40.1 29% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 49.1 8-Core 65.4 7% 57.2 Pts	64-Core 71.8 4% 71.8 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 16.8 Reflection 21.1 Parallax 16.1 14% 18 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 16.7 14% 17 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37 120G 120GB 202 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0921A SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 113 130 145 139 147 MB/s Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.3% Below average	Read 246 Write 198 Mixed 145 SusWrite 127 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 20.5 4K Mixed 7.7 40% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 42.4 50% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GB 3,584 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 7.4 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	6x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF F3-1600C11-4GNT 12GBKingstonBench 31%, 11 samples	4x
99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 12,132 samples	3x
F3-14900CL9-4GBXL F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 8GBUnknownBench 38%, 245 samples	3x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $324

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16