Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 121 45% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 176 26% 188 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7950 GT 351 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8225) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.4 2% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB 6,074 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: STRSD013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 325 367 372 370 376 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 396 Write 366 Mixed 341 SusWrite 356 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 62.7 4K Mixed 42.5 136% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 99.7 DQ Mixed 55.2 46% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 7.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	76x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	14x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GBBench 62%, 1,849 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	4x

RAM
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,321 samples	27x
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 32%, 459 samples	25x
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 3,888 samples	20x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16