| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20180507 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 01 '18 at 19:52 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | BLR-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.8%
Above average
|
74% 127 Pts
|
25% 192 Pts
|
12% 195 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 7950 GT
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.8
|
1.85%
Terrible
|
3% 2.05 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 286 264 244 227 219 MB/s
|
96.6%
Outstanding
|
73% 325 MB/s
|
161% 60.2 MB/s
|
249% 341 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
549GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 117 124 123 123 MB/s
|
69%
Good
|
77% 106 MB/s
|
144% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FDD2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.6%
Very good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
63% 22.2 GB/s
|
54% 74.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,551 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-R
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 925x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 374x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 273x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 526x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 340x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 304x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |