Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '21 at 09:10
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 117
58% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 418
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 26
Parallax 14.7
16% 20.1 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 25.8
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 800 256GB
117GB free
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 256 261 259 263 261 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 405
Write 255
Mixed 282
SusWrite 260
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 34.8
120% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 180
150% 217 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 109%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 148 153 149 162 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 162
Mixed 130
SusWrite 152
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 171 170 173 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 168
Mixed 129
SusWrite 171
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
181GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 87 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 89.7
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 87.1
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 58%
WD WD2004FBYZ-01YCBB0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 176 177 177 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 208
Mixed 157
SusWrite 178
127% 171 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
501% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C11-8GNT 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback