Foxconn G31MXP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn G31MXP  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 14:31
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
40.2% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 72.9
40% 59.5 Pts
4-Core 74.5
8-Core 67.8
10% 71.2 Pts
64-Core 60.9
4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingbank KP330 120G 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 43 68 100 99 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
Read 96.2
Write 161
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 66.2
73% 99 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.3
243% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 47%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
234GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 46 66 64 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 53.8
Write 66.5
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 50.9
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31MXP Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn G31MXP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback