Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59 18,604 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 72.1 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 86.1 43% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 82.5 8-Core 85.8 11% 84.2 Pts	64-Core 84.7 5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3549) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.9% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.97 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.9% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 65 57 40 33 49 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.8% Poor	Read 128 Write 125 Mixed 114 SusWrite 53.4 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 15.6 64% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.5 DQ Write 20.2 DQ Mixed 1.1 6% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 124GB free Firmware: AM001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 66 62 41 35 49 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 79.9 Write 77.9 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 54.7 43% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 4.8 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	34x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	32x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	30x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	41x
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples	34x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	20x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $87