QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 05:57
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 160
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 336
35% 282 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 419GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 71 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 81
SusWrite 71.1
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
3% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 72%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 90 92 164 137 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Red Hat VirtIO 581GB
346GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 72 72 72 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
Read 175
Write 143
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 71.2
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 103%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
334GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 36 31 32 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 108
Write 87.5
Mixed 72
SusWrite 33.9
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 103%
Red Hat VirtIO 463GB
305GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 38 35 37 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 93
Write 74.4
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 38
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback