QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '21 at 11:38
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 128
49% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 394
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 382
24% 382 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 173
Parallax 128
99% 141 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 120
Splatting 99.9
103% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 38GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,121
Write 628
Mixed 1,478
309% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 31.2
124% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 235
179% 243 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 57%
Red Hat VirtIO 419GB
145GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 334 341 321 316 346 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
Read 521
Write 336
Mixed 236
SusWrite 334
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 20.8
60% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 196
162% 240 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
831GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 168 174 175 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 86.5
Write 63.3
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 170
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 26.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback