PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC |
Memory | 27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150812 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '21 at 18:03 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$80
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 8.5 9 9.5 5.3 MB/s
|
5.18%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
183GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 97 101 101 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 4.3 4.1 6.1 4.5 MB/s
|
5.11%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 256GB
166GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 23 26 27 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples | 31x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 14x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 14x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 7x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 11% - Very poor | Total price: $30 |