| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock X79 Extreme9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 60.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140214 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '21 at 18:35 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
62% 105 Pts
|
45% 372 Pts
|
47% 755 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51.8%
Above average
|
51% 68.6 fps
|
53% 65.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
119GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 275 276 274 275 273 MB/s
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
86% 385 MB/s
|
115% 39 MB/s
|
205% 312 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 63 86 97 138 131 MB/s
|
56.8%
Above average
|
59% 80.1 MB/s
|
155% 0.83 MB/s
| |
|
MIMOBOT 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 5 5 5 5.4 5.4 MB/s
|
4.75%
Terrible
|
8% 7.5 MB/s
|
18% 1.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
43.4%
Average
|
44% 15.4 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
48% 82.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 118 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 32x |
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 31x |
| Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 10x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 10x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $1,960 |