Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 03:47
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Memory 85.2
1-Core 156
2-Core 311
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 611
8-Core 1,161
105% 886 Pts
64-Core 2142
133% 2142 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid PCIe SSD 1TB
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1358 846 856 351 678 749 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 623
Write 2135
Mixed 660
SusWrite 806
241% 1,056 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 34.1
153% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 802
DQ Mixed 357
319% 462 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 143%
Great: 214%
Amd-raid TEAM TM8FP6001T 1TB
890GB free
Firmware: T070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1379 1379 1369 1279 1255 1288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1470
Write 1,371
Mixed 890
SusWrite 1,325
284% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 22.6
145% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 226
255% 413 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 204%
Great: 204%
MB2000EAZNL 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 137 137 140 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 128
Mixed 110
SusWrite 138
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 51.5
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 43.5
134% 46.9 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 41.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 125%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback