Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 326 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X1800 22 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0B12) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.7% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.7% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 208 134 123 129 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 472 Write 382 Mixed 374 SusWrite 165 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 859B CT25664BA1339A.M16 Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.1% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	766x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	326x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	308x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	67x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	61x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	60x

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $108