Today's hottest deals

MSI H410M PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 10:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 723
72% 584 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 7C89) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9126
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 8.6
6% 6.9 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 67 136 136 67 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48% Average
Read 307
Write 126
Mixed 163
SusWrite 126
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 20.4
87% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 39.6
DQ Mixed 35.4
27% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 85%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$34
843GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 180 181 182 189 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 174
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 181
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R7S48G2400U2S 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI H410M PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback