Biostar H310MHC2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H310MHC2  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 16:47
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 244
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 584
67% 524 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 68 67 69 68 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 179
Write 86.8
Mixed 109
SusWrite 65.8
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 14.7
50% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 75.9
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 27.2
49% 92.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 337 314 314 311 284 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 271
Write 285
Mixed 256
SusWrite 304
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 15.1
57% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 138
102% 133 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
76GB free
Firmware: AM003M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 8.8 8.8 12 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Read 3
Write 4.1
Mixed 3
SusWrite 11.3
4% 5.35 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 60%
Kesu USB 3.0 500GB
369GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.51% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 19.3
12% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.51%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 8.8 8.9 9.2 8.7 9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 8.2
19% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.1
206% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHC2 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHC2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback