Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Supermicro X10DAi (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X10DAC
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel 33 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 80.8 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 165 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 646 57% 486 Pts	64-Core 2,012 124% 2,012 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.3% Above average	Lighting 63.8 Reflection 69 Parallax 59.6 52% 64.1 fps	MRender 72.6 Gravity 58 Splatting 55.3 50% 62 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 686GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 35 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 48 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 67 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 19 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1609707133	93.2% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 460 Mixed 493 109% 489 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 31.7 114% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 113 112% 181 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 477GB free Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	274% Outstanding	Read 2,323 Write 1,820 Mixed 1,563 422% 1,902 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 72.4 4K Mixed 49.9 159% 53.3 MB/s	DQ Read 461 DQ Write 453 DQ Mixed 247 243% 387 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 274% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 312GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5332 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 896 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 58 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 835 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2406857662	95.8% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 488 Mixed 510 113% 504 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 28.9 113% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 123 126% 205 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 193GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5317 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 867 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 53 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 96 96 3299 (EB) Unknown 99 99 136 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6094577977	95.8% Outstanding	Read 516 Write 489 Mixed 510 113% 505 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 29.6 112% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 115 124% 205 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB 4x8GB 249 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.1% Good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 22.1 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 79.1 51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	12x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	9x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GBSamsungBench 112%, 591 samples	4x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 8x8GBHynixBench 109%, 271 samples	3x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $206

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16