IBM System x3100 M5: -[5457AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM System x3100 M5: -[5457AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 16:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35% Below average
Memory 44
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 137
46% 84 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 153
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 58 54 58 53 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 47.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 54.2
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6
20% 7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3100 M5: -[5457AC1]- Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: IBM System x3100 M5: -[5457AC1]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback