Inversenet FRONTIER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemInversenet FRONTIER  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H110M-SI01
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171127
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateMar 07 '21 at 22:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 74
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 177
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 293
40% 296 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 39
Parallax 36.9
30% 37.4 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 26.6
27% 34.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD10EZEX-00WN4A0 240GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 58 54 54 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 443
Write 403
Mixed 371
SusWrite 82.1
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 34.4
112% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 235
192% 272 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79
789GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 160 166 164 164 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 145
Write 142
Mixed 68
SusWrite 162
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Read 34.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 5.1
14% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown L316008G3C1128K04O 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FRONTIER Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: Inversenet FRONTIER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $654
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback