Asus P8Q67-M DO/TPM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Q67-M DO/TPM  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 175
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 445
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8609) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 35.2
27% 35.5 fps
MRender 34.3
Gravity 35.7
Splatting 25.5
25% 31.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1003YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 63 67 74 79 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 97.3
Write 101
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 69.4
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G160081 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Q67-M DO/TPM Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8Q67-M DO/TPM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback