Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170-Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 11:17
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 72.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 214
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7770
MSI(1462 2710) 1GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.99% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 22.6
0% 13.6 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.1
11% 14.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 3.99%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PSS9N032GA27MC2 32GB
8GB free
Firmware: S9FM02L9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 47 48 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 222
Write 51.6
Mixed 158
SusWrite 47.3
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 13.6
102% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 7.2
34% 78.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
WD WD1600HLFS-60G6U2 160GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 77 78 72 68 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 109
Write 113
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 73.1
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
201% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FARG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 25
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 18.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback