QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 23:51
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 934
94% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,098
68% 1,098 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 96%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 201
Parallax 235
179% 219 fps
MRender 255
Gravity 220
Splatting 166
170% 214 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 415 420 425 428 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 435
Mixed 424
SusWrite 418
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 45
148% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x10GB
1 of 1 slots used
10GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.3
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 34.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback