QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230606
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '23 at 09:34
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	80%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.3% Very poor	Memory 14.2 1-Core 22.6 2-Core 46.2 15% 27.7 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 267 23% 198 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 45%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 22 21 22 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 420 Write 86.2 Mixed 240 SusWrite 21.3 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 6.5 4K Mixed 8.7 28% 7.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 161GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 146GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 106 98 98 102 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 438 Write 234 Mixed 388 SusWrite 102 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 10 34% 9.93 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 190 142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 84%
Qemu HARDDISK 54GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 50GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 102 104 97 104 106 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Qemu HARDDISK 27GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 25GB free Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 107 101 91 102 110 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x16GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1 of 1 slots used 16GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	46.1% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 22.6 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 331 12% 331 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 161%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	64	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359