Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1410 0 64 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 167 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 426 40% 333 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.97% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 0.3 2% 2 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.97% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 76 73 77 77 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 233 Write 77.3 Mixed 105 SusWrite 75.5 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 19.4 69% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 73.7 DQ Mixed 67.2 58% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 36KSF1G72PZ-1G4M1 4x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 6 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.2% Good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 24.5 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-YK0 6x16GBUnknownBench 67%, 16 samples	5x
18KSF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 24GBUnknownBench 72%, 7 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 48GBUnknownBench 75%, 5 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $233