Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160809
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 13 '21 at 11:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 1.80GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 134
55% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 470
43% 362 Pts
64-Core 615
38% 615 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Gigabyte(1458 22F2) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 22.6
14% 22.6 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 26
19% 23.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$69
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 101 111 148 174 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 167
Write 106
Mixed 188
SusWrite 119
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 5
17% 5.9 MB/s
DQ Read 456
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 168
154% 246 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 185%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
170GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 132 140 139 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 134
Mixed 30
SusWrite 137
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 103%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
95GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 91 90 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 77.8
Write 84.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 89.6
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D26BFSE.8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.5% Average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.2
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $600
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback