Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 01:00
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 76.2
1-Core 160
2-Core 312
97% 183 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 929
91% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,162
72% 1,162 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 154
Parallax 162
126% 157 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 133
Splatting 114
114% 143 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 892 922 907 893 965 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,974
Write 1,985
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 969
374% 1,667 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 55.9
197% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 845
DQ Mixed 906
680% 909 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 239%
Great: 297%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
69GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 485
Write 326
Mixed 362
SusWrite 162
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 37.2
137% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 138
121% 181 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 108%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
147GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 124 124 125 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 122
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
48GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 28 23 30 34 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 6,572
Write 4.5
SusWrite 22.8
1,571% 2,200 MB/s
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 15.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 4.8
19% 16 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
101% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 29
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,033
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback