Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 15 '21 at 13:58
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 886
90% 729 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 107%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 237 63 65 64 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 443
Mixed 346
SusWrite 151
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 53.5
179% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 134%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
406GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 4 19 47 93 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 457
Write 310
Mixed 300
SusWrite 56.2
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 5.9
54% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 28.8
39% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Extreme II 120GB-$130
112GB free
Firmware: R1311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 320 320 320 320 320 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 315
Mixed 241
SusWrite 320
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 36.6
141% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 132
117% 177 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 101%
NORELSYS 1081 32GB
2GB free, PID 1081, Transcend 32GB microSDHC
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 11 9.9 12 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 12.1
14% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4400 C19 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 26.5
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 23.8
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 25.9
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $935
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback