Biostar A68N-5600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5600  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 22 '21 at 18:27
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-4655M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 47.8
2-Core 77.2
43% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 124
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 5
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 196 192 69 80 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37% Below average
Read 204
Write 122
Mixed 156
SusWrite 127
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 15.7
65% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 43.7
DQ Mixed 27.5
22% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
54GB free
Firmware: CC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 94 98 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.4
Write 93.8
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 95.8
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 8.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5600 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback