Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '21 at 15:04
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$100
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 220
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
PowerColor(148C 3003) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.14% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.14%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 49 47 49 50 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 55
Write 53.3
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 48.7
35% 48.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 67.3
59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-MX Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback