Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120229
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateMar 13 '21 at 12:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 141
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 341
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
PowerColor(148C 3003) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT41K0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 60 71 76 74 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.1% Below average
Read 127
Write 95.5
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 71.4
22% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 17.4
70% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 92.3
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 41.5
41% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
212GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 79 78 78 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 78.9
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EX58-UD3R Builds (Compare 495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD3R - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback