MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE62 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '21 at 23:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 61.2
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 162
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 396
40% 327 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6611
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31.4
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 32.2
26% 31.6 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 20.7
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG5 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 203 210 207 216 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 408
Write 318
Mixed 273
SusWrite 227
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 24.5
96% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 154
159% 258 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 96%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
877GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 125 127 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 110
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 126
70% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 75%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 248GB
222GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 15 23 14 10 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 9
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 15
19% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback