Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemCisco UCSC-C240-M3S  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSC-C240-M3S
Memory211.2 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 13:31
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 174
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 605
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 1,987
123% 1,987 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 300 329 313 282 272 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
Read 616
Write 687
Mixed 365
SusWrite 328
112% 499 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 155
114% 150 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 83%
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 2TB
543GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.4 6.3 6.5 6.3 6.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 77 76 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
212% Outstanding
Read 658
Write 76.4
Mixed 104
SusWrite 76.5
166% 228 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.8
1,152% 8.4 MB/s
Poor: 212%
This bench: 212%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B2G70DB0-YK0 24x16GB
24 of 24 slots used
384GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 28.8
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.8
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback