ADD TO PC
BUILD

Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S (all builds)
Motherboard	Cisco UCSC-C240-M3S
Memory	363.9 GB free of 384 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	May 05 '21 at 00:18
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 75.8 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 154 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 675 60% 508 Pts	64-Core 2,066 128% 2,066 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 967GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 573 416 412 369 393 379 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	83.4% Excellent	Read 651 Write 761 Mixed 431 SusWrite 424 127% 567 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 40.7 4K Mixed 24.1 86% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 87.8 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 99.4 80% 109 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 83%
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 2TB 245GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.2 6.1 6.2 5.4 4.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1,489 Write 3.7 SusWrite 5.6 357% 500 MB/s	4K Read 467 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 19,589% 156 MB/s

LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 221% 707GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 78 77 78 78 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	230% Outstanding	Read 720 Write 72.4 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 77.8 176% 242 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 994% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 212% ↑ This bench: 230% Great: 230%
LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 511GB 476GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 50 48 50 48 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	131% Outstanding	Read 398 Write 53.2 Mixed 86.6 SusWrite 50.6 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 3.5 1,564% 10.9 MB/s

LSI UCSC-RAID2008M8i 2TB 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 147 146 148 147 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	69.7% Good	Read 88.3 Write 91.2 Mixed 90.6 SusWrite 147 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 8.3 1,891% 11.5 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B2G70DB0-YK0 24x16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 24 of 24 slots used 384GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.7% Very good	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 28.6 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6 23% 7.97 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback