Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 18:54
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 90.6
47% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 85.7
12% 87.6 Pts
64-Core 12.9
1% 12.9 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 97.1
Parallax 77.5
61% 83 fps
MRender 48.9
Gravity 34
Splatting 46.2
35% 43 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 52%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 254
Write 160
Mixed 154
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 0.7
30% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 9.7
24% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
SSD 120GB
52GB free
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 87 70 119 104 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 141
Write 84.3
Mixed 101
SusWrite 109
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 6.5
22% 7.57 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 119
105% 157 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 94%
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD
719GB free
Firmware: CS303227
SusWrite @10s intervals: 492 323 426 356 315 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 961
Mixed 431
SusWrite 391
128% 565 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 11.4
55% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 684
DQ Write 742
DQ Mixed 895
623% 774 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 286%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
60GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 68 74 87 75 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 92.9
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 82.6
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
246GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 42 50 55 50 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 35
SusWrite 50.7
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-2400C17-8GIS CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 G.SKILL F4-2400C17-8GIS 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,014
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback