Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '21 at 14:38
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 B59
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 102
49% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 95.6
8-Core 97.7
13% 96.6 Pts
64-Core 97.6
6% 97.6 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 128B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T180731
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 54 27 35 42 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 479
Write 9.6
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 42
30% 144 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 27
120% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 19.2
28% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
466GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 123 125 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 123
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
466GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 119 120 121 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 114
Write 112
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB
76GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 6.2 6.8 8.4 10 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 1.8
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 7.5
5% 3.95 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.7% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback