Today's hottest deals

ECS A960M-MV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A960M-MV  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '20 at 11:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 25.6
2-Core 53.1
31% 45 Pts
4-Core 52.5
8-Core 51.5
7% 52 Pts
64-Core 52.4
3% 52.4 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 3650
PwrHis(1787 2003) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.67
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.22
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 4.87
3% 3.05 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian H100 32GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 28 35 29 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 41% Great: 48%
FC-1307 SD to CF Adapter 67GB
62GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.6 1.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.68% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 1.5
3% 4.53 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.68%
Great: 4%
Generic Flash Disk0912 124GB
100GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8.8 9.3 6.8 9.2 9.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 9
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 8.3
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960M-MV Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A960M-MV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback