HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2224
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 507
67% 505 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.63 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VS000480KWDUP 480GB
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPK4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 458 465 472 473 461 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
146% Outstanding
Read 1,015
Write 479
Mixed 462
SusWrite 466
134% 606 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 39.6
166% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 409
DQ Mixed 456
378% 553 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 146%
Great: 146%
HP 8GB_EM_USB_Drive 8GB
0GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.9 1.3 2.2 2 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Read 22
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 1.9
9% 8.78 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 12%
HP 8GB_EM_USB_Drive 8GB
1GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 1.6 0.7 2.9 1.6 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 5
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 1.8
9% 8.77 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 13.1
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant ML30 Gen10 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback