Today's hottest deals

MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 640 x 480 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 736
73% 594 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W8000
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 47.4
28% 37.6 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 21
22% 27.5 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 2.3 105 65 20 178 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 449
Write 352
Mixed 247
SusWrite 83.6
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 10.4
41% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR64GX4M4A2666C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 27.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $617
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback