PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191113 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | May 14 '21 at 23:03 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD PRO A10-9700 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
33.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 20 12 4.4 101 111 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
222GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 259 143 91 91 91 MB/s
|
58%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
114GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 105 104 105 105 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
8GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.4 4 4 3.7 3.8 MB/s
|
6.26%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CM4X8GF2400C16N2 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 867x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 715x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 424x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 403x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $358 |