Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory47.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 22:07
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 58.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
84% 162 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 840
83% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,100
68% 1,100 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Gigabyte(1458 21F4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 5.9
6% 7 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 7.5
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 240GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 104 94 93 93 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 435
Write 381
Mixed 327
SusWrite 127
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 32.7
126% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 153
121% 167 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 91%
Sabrent Rocket Q4 2TB
862GB free
Firmware: RKT40Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 89 42 114 50 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 159
Write 70.3
Mixed 114
SusWrite 77.3
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 82.5
DQ Mixed 148
157% 276 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 421%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 204 206 203 213 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 206
Mixed 160
SusWrite 208
266% 197 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 2.4
350% 5.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 100%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW256GX4M8E3200C16 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 18.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 17.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback