Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97I-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97I-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160218
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 18:41
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$115
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 208
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 579
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 27.2
27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SE20G-256 256GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 256 137 216 257 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 579
Write 463
Mixed 255
SusWrite 220
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 44.4
142% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 707
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 179
187% 327 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 209%
WDC WD7500AZEX-00RKKA0 120GB
21GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 478
Write 370
Mixed 360
89% 403 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 40.5
143% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 138
109% 156 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 108 107 110 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 141
Write 106
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 105
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 106%
Sony Card R/W -MS 32GB
15GB free, PID 01bd
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 14 10 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
9.28% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 14.1
Mixed 14
SusWrite 12.6
20% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.6
100% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.28%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 21.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 21.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 56.2
71% 56.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 7R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 11% 82 107 5 75 24.5" 1920 1080 IVM6133 PL2530H
Typical Z97I-PLUS Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z97I-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback