Blade Shadow Computer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemBlade Shadow Computer  (all builds)
MotherboardBlade ShadowM
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 20:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3235
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 244
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 716
71% 581 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000
Nvidia(10DE 12BA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 176
Parallax 188
144% 180 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 185
Splatting 156
147% 184 fps
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 115 116 117 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 108%
Qemu HARDDISK 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 119 119 118 119 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 52% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Blade OSFSVPPK3QLHSE-ZPY 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
106% Outstanding
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 34.7
123% 43.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 9.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 144 0" 1280 720 BLD0101 C27JG5x
Typical Shadow Computer Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Blade Shadow Computer

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback