Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 25 '21 at 14:14
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 944
85% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 130
Parallax 119
95% 122 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 123
Splatting 111
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,585
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,252
332% 1,489 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 53.5
179% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 484
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 448
323% 421 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850 1 1TB
554GB free
Firmware: 611100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,341
Write 45.5
Mixed 92.3
379% 1,826 MB/s
4K Read 238
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 6
370% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 495%
Intenso Sata III 498GB
362GB free
Firmware: Q0823B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 238
Mixed 378
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 26
84% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 89.1
99% 167 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 110%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
365GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 319
Mixed 355
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 42.5
138% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 220
164% 218 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
159GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 59.5
Write 53.9
Mixed 41.2
64% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 32.5
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 30.1
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 100 35" 1280 720 AOC3525 AG352UCG6
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback