Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 28 '21 at 07:17
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 174
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 336
38% 295 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.5% Average
Lighting 57.1
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 76.8
46% 65.1 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 44
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JD 240GB 240GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 15 18 18 47 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 439
Write 352
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 51.6
47% 215 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 13.5
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 49.3
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
9% 23.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 115%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
167GB free
Firmware: 1AC01114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 96 88 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 95
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 92.7
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 21.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 3R 7G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 31% 49 110 8 60 21.5" 1280 720 VSC0F30 VA2261
History: Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 36: 4R 4G 4B | Score 41: 3R 7G 5B
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback