Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 134
2-Core 253
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 733
72% 587 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.6
34% 40.2 fps
MRender 36.8
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 26.4
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.4
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 11.5
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU635 480GB-$35
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 278 8.9 5.8 7.3 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 498
Write 324
Mixed 21
SusWrite 61.1
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 0.4
40% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 17.3
DQ Mixed 0.4
19% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
630GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 138 135 135 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 169
Mixed 118
SusWrite 136
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
297GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 119 118 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 59
SusWrite 116
69% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.3% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback