PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
Memory | 16.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190904 |
Uptime | 3.5 Days |
Run Date | Jul 02 '21 at 12:10 |
Run Duration | 268 Seconds |
Run User | CHL-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
231GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 74 92 158 207 207 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 148 152 153 153 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX2400C15/16G 859B BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
|
64%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
38% | 10% | 136 | 253 | 175 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | LEN65E0 LEN L27i-28 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,320x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,509x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 293x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 636x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 463x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 360x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $355 |