Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 03:33
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 308
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,050
100% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,609
100% 1,609 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,350
Device(7377 140A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
127% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 163
Parallax 163
133% 163 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 163
Splatting 163
134% 163 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 127%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SHGP31-1000GM-2 1TB
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41061C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1813 1628 1577 1493 1437 1397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,736
Write 2,458
Mixed 1,638
SusWrite 1,558
470% 2,097 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 87.2
292% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 859
DQ Mixed 940
708% 951 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 338%
Great: 397%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
25GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 479
Mixed 430
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 50.5
167% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Adata XPG SX8000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$100
238GB free
Firmware: C2.2.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 1016 1016 1018 1019 1005 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 948
Write 998
Mixed 757
SusWrite 1,012
210% 929 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 52.9
198% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 382
331% 477 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 184%
Great: 181%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
71GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 137 148 123 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 121
Write 87.3
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 129
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ03ABB300 3TB
500GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 39.5
Write 41.2
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 41.7
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 71%
Samsung P3 Portable 2TB
515GB free, PID 61c5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 75.9
Write 66.2
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 99.1
100% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 33.3
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 32
98% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 6R 4G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 23% 98 65 10 60 27" 2560 1440 LEN65EE LEN Y27q-20
History: Score 32: 3R 3G 8B | Score 55: 6R 4G 13B
Typical GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 1,266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $946
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback