Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory60.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 22:21
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 151
2-Core 301
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,198
103% 880 Pts
64-Core 2828
175% 2828 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.8
15% 18.5 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.1
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1874 276 297 211 121 247 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,778
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,892
SusWrite 504
360% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 84.1
279% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,350
DQ Write 1,137
DQ Mixed 1,233
927% 1,240 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 244%
Great: 365%
Toshiba MG04ACA400N 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FJ3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 197 196 198 196 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 188
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 196
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
269% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 110%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
16TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 222 219 220 227 225 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 214
Mixed 160
SusWrite 224
276% 203 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 2.6
433% 6.53 MB/s
DQ Read 3.6
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 2.4
411% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4DFD8266.C16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 33.8
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 32.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 19.5" 1280 720 SPT080D Sceptre E20
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $935
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback