Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '21 at 02:40
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 220
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 821
74% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 92.5
55% 74.4 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 47.4
49% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Enmotus T00 FuzeDrive 1TB
965GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 121 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 436
Write 378
Mixed 305
SusWrite 121
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 11.4
81% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 16.7
54% 114 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 85%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
251GB free
Firmware: S0318B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 388 376 489 360 370 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,705
Write 712
Mixed 224
SusWrite 388
165% 757 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 14.8
92% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 907
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 15.1
225% 540 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 154%
Great: 291%
Apple HDD ST2000DM001 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: AP54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 183 185 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 132
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 181
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 115%
ST932032 0AS 320GB
298GB free, PID 00db
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 17 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 31
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 14.1
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 17%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 640GB
167GB free, PID 2100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 17 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Read 30.8
Write 35.9
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 14.3
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 17%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
1TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 7.4 4 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 33.3
Mixed 27
SusWrite 10.4
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C20 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 30
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 15% 27 335 272 60 72.3" 1280 720 TSB2017 TOSHIBA-TV
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback