Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 16:28
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 79.9
2-Core 174
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 575
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 48.9
46% 54.1 fps
MRender 42.1
Gravity 51.4
Splatting 46.3
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 385 292 293 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 442
Mixed 426
SusWrite 352
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 1001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 187 187 189 190 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 179
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 187
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 32GB
24GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 8.7 9.6 8.5 8.4 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 19.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 8.7
18% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA0D9 DELL P2217H
Typical GA-X79-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD3 - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback