Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-970-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '21 at 21:21
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 146
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 450
45% 366 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1060 MHz, MLim: 1505 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.5% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 75.1
Parallax 87.7
55% 76.8 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 57.5
Splatting 45.7
45% 56 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 111 24 90 62 23 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 195
Write 97
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 82.3
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 10.2
43% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$28
51GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 0.2
Mixed 20
SusWrite 14.2
12% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 58%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 1TB
327GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 183 184 182 181 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 167
Mixed 32
SusWrite 182
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
136GB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8 9.6 8 8 8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 22
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 8.2
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HTS545050B9SA00 500GB
111GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 62 62 62 62 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 61
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 46%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
548GB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8 6.4 8 8 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 28.5
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 7.7
17% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-970-GAMING Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback